Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 11:02:47 GMT
You can then address, punish or unfollow them if they have not properly checked ai-generated content. Some regulators want a general obligation to be transparent about the use of generative ai. voted for an ai act with strict rules and hopes that it will become a global standard, just like the gdpr privacy legislation. You must then always indicate to the user if content has been created by ai. But how do you define that? There is a large gray area between an ai chatbot and a creative human writing. What if people use ai for drafts , which they then edit themselves? Or use an ai-driven search engine for inputs.
Then I think ai is a tool and not Business Owner Phone Numbers List fundamentally different from a spell checker. Self-driving ai this is of course different for autonomous ai, such as chatbots. There, the ai communicates directly with the user, without the intervention of a human moderator. For example, think of a help desk or customer service. In these cases, it seems only logical to me that you should inform the user that he is communicating with an ai. This also applies to tools like copilot, whenever they come. If you let an ai assistant make the minutes and action points of an online meeting, a translation of a policy document for a specific target group, or an analysis of the quarterly figures, be open about that. Just like now with an automatic e-mail reply when you are on vacation. But much better, in my opinion, is to agree that you always check ai content before sharing it with others.
On factual correctness, completeness and relevance. This way you always keep people in the loop and combine the best of both worlds: the efficiency, scope and processing power of ai, and the originality, contextual understanding, emotional intelligence and moral compass of humans. Tools & tips but if you still want to catch that lazy colleague, or arm yourself against fake news , here are a few tools and tips to distinguish ai-generated content from the human kind: gptzero is the first and largest (according to them). Developed by a student in his proverbial attic room. Works fine, in my experience. Openai, the makers of chatgpt and dall-e, make the ai text classifier available themselves.
Then I think ai is a tool and not Business Owner Phone Numbers List fundamentally different from a spell checker. Self-driving ai this is of course different for autonomous ai, such as chatbots. There, the ai communicates directly with the user, without the intervention of a human moderator. For example, think of a help desk or customer service. In these cases, it seems only logical to me that you should inform the user that he is communicating with an ai. This also applies to tools like copilot, whenever they come. If you let an ai assistant make the minutes and action points of an online meeting, a translation of a policy document for a specific target group, or an analysis of the quarterly figures, be open about that. Just like now with an automatic e-mail reply when you are on vacation. But much better, in my opinion, is to agree that you always check ai content before sharing it with others.
On factual correctness, completeness and relevance. This way you always keep people in the loop and combine the best of both worlds: the efficiency, scope and processing power of ai, and the originality, contextual understanding, emotional intelligence and moral compass of humans. Tools & tips but if you still want to catch that lazy colleague, or arm yourself against fake news , here are a few tools and tips to distinguish ai-generated content from the human kind: gptzero is the first and largest (according to them). Developed by a student in his proverbial attic room. Works fine, in my experience. Openai, the makers of chatgpt and dall-e, make the ai text classifier available themselves.